Pakistan’s Kashmir Narrative Collides With Administrative Reality
Pakistan’s international advocacy on Kashmir is increasingly at odds with the conditions described in POJK vs IJK, a visual and analytical comparison that questions the credibility of Islamabad’s claims .
The document emphasizes that political life in PoJK is tightly circumscribed, with constitutional arrangements that place decisive authority outside the region. This structure, the comparison argues, limits genuine political pluralism and restricts the scope of local decision-making.
Set against this, Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir is depicted as having broader civic infrastructure and institutional visibility. While the document does not deny controversy or conflict on the Indian side, it presents the contrast as undermining Pakistan’s moral positioning in international forums.
The implication is clear: Pakistan’s diplomatic messaging struggles to withstand side-by-side scrutiny.
